A discussion on the existence of god and the cosmological argument

What if I call it absoulte infinity? There is never any claim that we have all of them together all at once.

The Kalam Cosmological Argument Discussion

In esse essence is more akin to the light from a candle or the liquid in a vessel. In order to get to now. In popular culture, the Big Bang has been viewed as a vindication of theism with many theists lamenting on how science is finally in agreement with the fundamental presupposition of western religion: The Argument from Contingency In the case of the argument from contingencythe distinction drawn between the universe and God is that the existence of the universe is contingent, i.

Very low probability, but short of zero. These criticisms aside, even if we accept the notion that some sort of powerful deity is the cause of the Big Bang, it is still possible that this creator has a malevolent or indifferent character.

Philosophy of Religion

If 1 exists then 2 does. Todd put it "Even if all the data pointed to an intelligent designer, such a hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic. This definition of a triangle would hold true even if no triangles existed at all.

But this only pushes causation back and implies that there must be an infinite number of causes, which cannot be. The argument is that this chain of events either has a cause or does not. The basic argument is that all things that have beginnings had to have causes. Since it is possible for such things not to exist, there must be some time at which these things did not in fact exist.

So, the cosmological argument works for the Christian. It may require occasional maintenance, but that is beyond the scope of the first cause argument. Unwin, is to treat particular versions of theism and naturalism as though they were two hypotheses in the Bayesian sense, to list certain data or alleged dataabout the world, and to suggest that the likelihoods of these data are significantly higher under one hypothesis than the other.

Cosmological argument

Apatheism An apatheist is someone who is not interested in accepting or denying any claims that gods exist or do not exist. In the academic community, many philosophers of religion have used this cosmology as the basis for an analytic defense of theism.

Weaknesses of the argument One of the weaknesses of the argument is that if all things need a cause to exist, then God Himself must also, by definition, need a cause to exist.

Existence of God

In addition, according to concepts of God, God is not part of the natural order, but the ultimate creator of nature and of the scientific laws. In TimaeusPlato posited a "demiurge" of supreme wisdom and intelligence as the creator of the Cosmos. An apatheist lives as if there are no gods and explains natural phenomena without reference to any deities.

He further posed that the unquenchable desires of this life strongly imply that we are intended for a different life, necessarily governed by a God who can provide the desired intangibles.

Aquinas – the cosmological argument for the existance of God

But, is it true that "all things that exist must have a cause"?The Cosmological Argument is discussed which attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist.

A description of the Cosmological Argument supporting the existence of God.

The Cosmological Argument

Mar 27,  · The Kalam Cosmological Argument: A Summary by Bill Ramey The cosmological argument for God's existence began with Plato and ever since has been defended--and attacked--by many of the greatest philosophers in history. The kalam cosmological argument has grown in popularity today, mostly through the work of Dr.

William Lane Craig, an Evangelical Protestant philosopher who dedicated his doctoral work to the argument in The cosmological argument not only seeks to reason the existence of God but could also be said to provide a meaning to life in the world. For instance, if we know where we have come from then surely, it could be argued, we have some idea of where we are going.

Question: "What is the Cosmological argument for the existence of God?" Answer: The cosmological argument attempts to prove God’s existence by observing the world around us (the cosmos). It begins with what is most obvious in reality: things exist. It is then argued that the cause of those things’ existence had to be a "God-type" thing.

Aquinas cosmological argument for the existence of God is known to be the most popular by philosopher and religious scholars. In his theological masterpiece, Summa Theologia, he proposed varies forms of cosmological arguments to explain "ways" that he thought would prove God exists.

A discussion on the existence of god and the cosmological argument
Rated 5/5 based on 93 review